Braxton Hunter Is Wrong About The Historicity Of Luke

Today we are going to take a critical look at how wrong Braxton Hunter is about the historicity of Luke. Luke claims to have studied everything from the eyewitnesses of Jesus. The only problem is that there are no eyewitnesses of Jesus. Not even Paul indicates that anyone was an eyewitness. We compare Luke's writing to those of ancient historians to see if Luke was even trying to Record history. Spoiler: he wasn't. Luke made it pretty clear from the start that he was not trying to record history and was only seeking to reinforce Christian beliefs. With the help of critical historians, I examine and explain why none of the Gospels are considered to be historical accounts. Original Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqEmOtjHv8E Daily Bible Podcast: http://www.thedailybiblepodcast.com Subscribe to this channel: http://SubToGE.com Join the Skeptic Mafia: http://JoinSkepticMafia.com Available Deals -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Get 25% Off Ekster Wallets: https://bit.ly/GEWalletDeal -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Merch -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Download CHRESTUS: https://chrest.us Get your "Citation Fucking Needed" Shirt: http://citationfuckingneeded.com "got evidence?" shirt: http://gotevidenceshirt.com "btw, evolution is a fact" shirt: http://btwevolutionisafact.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discord Server: http://bit.ly/JoinGodlessDiscord Citations ======== “Ancient Historical Writing Compared to the Gospels of the New Testament (2016).” The Secular Web, infidels.org/library/modern/matthew_ferguson/gospel-genre.html. Carrier, Richard. On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason to Doubt. Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014. May, Herbert G., and Bruce Manning. Metzger. The New Oxford Annotated Bible: The Holy Bible: Revised Standard Version Containing the Old and New Testaments ... Introductions, Comments, Cross References, General Articles, Measures and Weights, Chronological Tables of Rulers, Maps, and Indexes. Oxford University Press, 1973. “Why Scholars Doubt the Traditional Authors of the Gospels (2017).” The Secular Web, infidels.org/library/modern/matthew_ferguson/gospel-authors.html. Arrien, and E. J. Chinnock. The Anabasis of Alexander: or, The History of the Wars and Conquests of Alexander the Great. Hodder and Stoughton, 1934. Bechard, Dean. Biblica, vol. 90, no. 1, 2009, pp. 126–129. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/42614886. Accessed 15 June 2021.


View on YouTube.