These 2 Arguments Really Hurt Theistic Claims || Spartan Theology Rebuttal #2

Teacher or professor: Godless Engineer
Subject: Science, Politics
Content of the Lesson: Today I'm presenting my second rebuttal to Spartan Theology. I feel like 2 of my arguments really hurt any theistic claims. The prior probability of any theistic claim being true is incredibly low. That doesn't mean that it can't be true, just that it needs really strong evidence to overcome our prior knowledge. Insufficient explanations should be an important aspect of Theism. If theism is supposed to explain aspects of reality but only resolve to "God" then what good is it? "God" isn't an explanation for anything...it's a place holder that explains as much as "I don't know." Spartan Theology's Rebuttal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJiYHksyQ7w Debate Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpREDq8hwB0wNefFp8XviUCpf8LrhUlNJ Subscribe to this channel: http://SubToGE.com Join the Skeptic Mafia: http://JoinSkepticMafia.com Download CHRESTUS: https://chrest.us Discord Server: http://bit.ly/JoinGodlessDiscord Intro by "Gonna Go For it": https://goo.gl/1Ay1Q3


Click here to view video on YouTube.