ARROGANT Male Karen Thinks Protection Orders Are Just SUGGESTIONS!!! Pro Se FAIL!!!

⚖️ARROGANT Male Karen Thinks Protection Orders Are Just SUGGESTIONS!!! Pro Se FAIL!!! Today we meet Jacob Mann, a defendant who is taking "Pro Se" to a whole new level of delusional. Facing a Class 1 Misdemeanor and two separate felony matters, Jacob has decided to fire his public defender because her knowledge of the law "just ain't matching up" with his "fresh research." Watch as Jacob attempts to flip the script by asking the judge to modify a mandatory protection order to include HIM as a protected party from his domestic violence victim. Between missing mandatory filing deadlines and citing civil statutes in a criminal courtroom, Jacob is providing a masterclass in how to speedrun a conviction. In this video, we break down: The "Fresh Research" Defense: Why firing a professional attorney for your own Google Law school degree is always a mistake. Civil vs. Criminal Law Confusion: Jacob attempts to use Statute 1314-108 (Civil) to modify a 18-1-1001 (Criminal) protection order. The "Victim Rights" Reality Check: The judge explains why she can't just grant Jacob's "one-way street" demands without consulting the victim first. Procedural Disaster: From crashed computers to missing backup files, witness the struggle of a defendant who doesn't understand "Due Process." If you enjoy seeing logic and facts applied to absolute courtroom nonsense, make sure to HIKE the video, leave a comment for the algorithm, and subscribe to join the Skeptic Crew! 📌 TIMESTAMPS: 00:00:00 Intro: Meet the confidently stupid Jacob Mann 00:00:43 Jacob fires his Public Defender: "I freshly researched" 00:01:58 The "Maze of Navigation": Advisory Counsel vs. ADC 00:02:44 The Arguello Advisement: Formal warning for Pro Se status 00:04:12 When does a "Speedy Trial" actually begin? 00:05:00 Facing 1 year in jail: Penalties explained 00:06:50 Arraignment vs. Trial Divisions: Courtroom 303 00:08:18 Jacob’s big move: Application to modify the Protection Order 00:10:52 PRO SE FAIL: Referencing the wrong law 00:12:13 Victim Rights Amendment (VRA) compliance explained 00:13:00 "It can't be a one-way street": Jacob claims self-defense 00:15:20 Hearing #2: The Failure to Appear (FTA) issue 00:16:18 The judge clears up the "Merged Cases" confusion 00:20:00 Public Defender conflict of interest explained 00:22:21 "Procedural Defects": Jacob blames a crashed computer 00:24:40 The judge gives "Wiggle Room" to a Pro Se defendant 00:26:24 "Do you want a lawyer or not?" (The simple question) 00:28:44 Rule 4 and 5 of Criminal Procedure: The final advisement 00:30:51 Conflict with the advisory counsel: "I don't know you" 00:33:50 THE RULING: One final deadline (December 12th) 00:38:00 Outro: Witnessing the courtroom crash-out


View on YouTube.